Ah yes! This looks good, and honestly we could merge, I simply wanted to verify that query with some testing, but haven’t had time and I’d honestly say we could merge, but we are trying hard to hold off on merging until stable is tagged (although we aren’t mega strict ;))
r
reed
04/24/2018, 12:24 AM
well, half of this has already landed, so would be good to have this correction landed before stable is tagged so that it is included 🙂
t
thor
04/24/2018, 12:25 AM
Right, the hope was to ensure the correction was fully correct, but I trust @clong :)
Unfortunately we already fucked up, as 3.2.3 is the latest stable, and so this should’ve landed there :/
r
reed
04/24/2018, 12:28 AM
ah, that's unfortunate, indeed, especially since it's been sitting for 20 days 😞
but I guess it'll just be in the next stable version, hopefully... and just people need to know that the results are not as useful until then