I clicked some things around what actions are required. And https://github.com/osquery/osquery/pull/6953 should remove Azure.

I'm not sure where these come from specifically but it seems that they'll never become "ready"

Those might have been azure ones. I don’t know if I clicked all the right things

yeah I mean, they match the names of the workflows on github actions, but they don't seem to be used

I have unchecked them as required

I think this was noticed by Alessandro too initially when adding the support. There were no checks for the whole thing

Yeah, I remember that about your Azure setup. It seemed nice.

Right, it needs to be created manually. Sorry I actually remember talking about this too now. Good catch though.

I don’y think it’s a blocker. I think it’s mostly a nice to have to correctly manage the required checks on a branch

It is still partially annoying because we have multiple jobs and we need to list them in this final job we use for the check, while on Azure it was automatic.. you couldn't forget to add one.

Maybe. There might be a way to create a single one that farms it out. But I think we’re also just shuffling it around.

yeah but in every case you need to change the build.yml file to make it work. Just saying that's different, beyond that, we will live! ahah

I don’t think we do

There are multiple matrix

Right. We need a job per matrix, one a job that enumerates all matrixes.

Well there are also jobs which are "standalone", like the check source code one

Sure. But we’re still talking 4 — lint, plus the 3 platforms

Just to clarify I'm not saying that it's a major issue, just saying that it's not as automatic as it was on Azure which was automatically adding whatever job was created under the single "osquery" pipeline check. We definitely have ways to make it work in GA just saying that if you have to change the build.yml to add a new standalone job, you've got to remember to add that to the final check job too, unless there's a way to list all the jobs into the

needs

key, programmatically.

Oh, I see… in Azure you could do a single “everything passes”

yeah sorry if I made it seem bigger than it was ^^'

As an aside, it’s kinda weird comparing Azure to github. Given that the latter is built on the former, I’d expect more convergence. But they’re oddly different

yep ahah. Probably different UX/UI teams