Hey Fam. I'm either not a smart person (Like <@U09...
# core
t
Hey Fam. I'm either not a smart person (Like @theopolis ;)), or skipping steps, as here are the signed packages for osquery 4.4.0 on windows! Lemme know how they work or if there are any issues. Cheers. Additionally, I took this opportunity to whip up a Git Gist about how I build these packages in a signed fashion, feel free to take a peruse! https://gist.github.com/muffins/7925e8bf8aed3230e82eb0f67f379389
t
Heads up it looks like the
nupkg
filename is incorrect. It should be
osquery-VERSION.nupkg
correct?
t
No, not for nupkg, they need to have the dot structure. If you change it chocolatey wont be able to find the file locally. I think I might've changed the filename in S3 when i uploaded, but when I upload to Chocolatey It needs the dots.
Ima check if this behavior has changed, but that logic in the nupkg file generation was intentional.
Yeah, still dumb :P
Honestly @theopolis, I only ever put those packages in S3 for shits. I don't actually think any one uses those, and I don't even know if anyone knows they're there. I think I made the decision to put them there for good measure or something?
g
They used to be used.
We deployed a whole bunch of 2.x releases back in the day when we didn’t know about how to run osquery properly
t
😮 Off of the S3 chocolatey packages?? Wow, TIL