Hey all! quick question - Why are we adding the

arch

to the

name

here if we already are extracting the

arch

here ? - Thanks!

cc @alessandrogario is this perhaps unintentional?

it should in theory be matching the old implementation; i only refactored the code and if the output has changed it was not intentional

@alessandrogario for ref https://github.com/osquery/osquery/issues/7637